Legal Opinion · Dissent

Haralampopoulos ex rel. Haralampopoulos v. Kelly

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 2011No. 10CA0668Published

1Dissent

Judge WEBB

dissenting.

In reversing the trial court's discretionary decision, the majority mischaracterizes the hearsay at issue as a statement of blame and applies an overly narrow approach to the diagnostic process. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

I. Hearsay Evidence of Plaintiff's Recent Cocaine Use

A. Facts Relevant to Dissent

When Ms. Hurd allegedly made the hearsay statements concerning plaintiffs recent cocaine use to Dr. Kelly, plaintiff was suffering from severe and irreversible brain injury. His health care providers then understood that toxic material released from the cyst during…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
  3. Phillips v. Hillcrest Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Melvin JoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. BelfastCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API