Grimm v. State

OPINION

Tracy Christopher, Justice

This is an appeal from a conviction for unlawfully possessing more than fifty items of identifying information. Appellant raises two issues: (1) whether the evidence is legally sufficient to support his *820conviction, and (2) whether the trial court reversibly erred by admitting certain exhibits over his hearsay objection. We conclude that the evidence is sufficient and that the trial court did not err by admitting the challenged exhibits. We therefore affirm the trial court’s judgment.

BACKGROUND

Police received a report of suspicious activity at a hotel. When…