Legal Opinion
R‑A‑F‑
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2020No. ID 3977PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
27 I&N Dec. 778
(A.G. 2020) Interim Decision #3977 Matter of R-A-F-, Respondent Decided by Attorney General February 26, 2020 U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General (1) The Board of Immigration Appeals should consider de novo the application of law to the facts of this case, including whether the deprivations that the respondent would be likely to encounter upon removal to Mexico would constitute “torture” within the meaning of the Department of Justice regulations implementing the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Negusie v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Pierre v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Auguste v. RidgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- J-EBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
- Luis Dutton Myrie v. Attorney General United StateCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- De Carvalho v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- A-A-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
- A-A-F-VBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
- Tabora Gutierrez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- J-H-M-HBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.