Legal Opinion
State v. Leininger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 10, 1970No. 42353PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
By alternative writ of prohibition dated December 22, 1969, the Municipal Court of Hennepin County was directed to show cause why it should not be prohibited from conducting a court trial without a jury in the action entitled State of Minnesota v. Paul Vincent Leininger.
Relator was charged with reckless driving in violation of Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, § 403.020, which is substantially the same as the proscription appearing in the Highway Traffic Regulation Act as Minn. St. 169.13, subd. 1. At arraignment in the municipal court, a request was made for a jury trial. The request was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. BorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. HobenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. PaulickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Williams v. RolfeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of St. Paul v. HitzmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Collins v. Cochrane and Bresnahan, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Korf v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- City of St. Paul v. DiBucciSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- City of St. Paul v. DiBucciSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975