Legal Opinion

Wright v. Closson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1924No. 2939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT.

BRATTON, J.

The appellee and cross-appellant, E. R. Wright, will be hereinafter called plaintiff, and the appellants and cross-appellees, Cbas. C. Closson, mayor of the city of Santa Fe, and A. S. Alvord, R. L. Baca, Marcelino Ortiz, Telesforo Rivera, Pedro Roybal, E. L. Safford, Nicholas Sena, and John Shoemaker, members of the city council, will be referred to as the defendants.

On February 19, 1924, the defendants issued an election proclamation calling a general election to be held in said city on April 1, 1924, for the purpose of electing a mayor, treasurer, clerk, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Halbert v. San Saba Springs Land & Live Stock Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Dillingham v. City CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  4. Dailey v. PughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Gallegos v. OrtizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gibbany v. FordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Kiehne v. AtwoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Valdez v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Alexander v. HighfillWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Bryan v. BarnettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API