Legal Opinion

Pickens v. Kizer

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 15, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This bill was filed by a tenant in common to force a sale of the reversion of certain marble rights lying upon and under the surface of the soil which was owned in fee by the complainant.

In 1892, John W. Kizer and wife conveyed the tract of land described in the bill to A.R. Kizer but reserved to himself one-half interest of the marble on the same. On October 1, 1904, John W. Kizer, J.L. Kizer and J.W. Kizer, Senior, the first named two being heirs at law of A.R. Kizer, deceased, and the three conveyors owning the whole of the marble interests, leased to the Knox Marble Railway Company, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jordan v. JordanTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HatchTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Northcut v. ChurchTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bierce v. JamesTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Morris v. MesserTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tennessee Valley Kaolin Corp. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
  2. Sherrill v. ErwinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  3. Tennessee Valley Kaolin Corp. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
  4. Tennessee Valley Kaolin Corp. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API