Legal Opinion

Sherrill v. Erwin

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 10, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

The original bill in this cause sought to reform a deed and prayed for injunctive relief to prohibit waste upon and destruction to the real estate involved. Later complainants amended their hill and asked the Court to determine whether the surface land was damaged by wrongful excavations made by defendants stripping the land to remove the coal therefrom and for damages, if any, to the surface land.

The case was heard upon oral testimony and the Chancellor held that complainants’ proof was insufficient to establish a mutual mistake in the execution of the deed; that considering complainants’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murray v. AllredTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Northcut v. ChurchTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Pearne v. Coal Creek M. & M. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  4. McBurney v. Glenmary Coal & Coke Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Pickens v. KizerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore Construction Co. v. Clarksville Department of ElectricityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  2. Oman Construction Co. v. Tennessee Central, Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Rutherford County v. City of MurfreesboroTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. Lahiere-Hill, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API