Tennessee Valley Kaolin Corp. v. Perry

OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR

NEARN, Judge.

A petition to rehear has been filed complaining of the Court’s failure to consider *492the argument of counsel regarding the alleged unconscionability of the notice provisions of the lease agreement.

We did not directly comment on that point in our former Opinion. However, we did consider it and we thought adequately treated it when we referred to the case of Pickens v. Kizer (1930 E.S.) 11 Tenn.App. 551, as the prime authority for overruling the Assignments of Error.

The notice provisions contained in the lease in the Pickens case, supra, are strikingly…