McNeal v. Truesdell

OULLISON, Y. O. X

(dissenting). For convenience we adopt in part the statement of the case set out in the majority opinion of the above-entitled action.

Defendants alleged in their counterclaim that the notes sued on were tainted with ' usury and sought to recover double the amount of usurious interest received, reserved, or charged on said notes with reasonable attorney’s fee. • •

The trial ^ourt found that the contract was tainted with usury in the amount of $675, which sum was composed of $450 excess, bonus, or usurious interest, added to the actual amount received by defendant. The trial…