Legal Opinion

BEIERSDOERFER v. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 2010No. 1090564Published

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Werner Beiersdoerfer appeals from a judgment of the trial court holding that Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company (“HRH”); Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton of Alabama, Inc.; and BDF-Meadows, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the HRH corporations”), are entitled to a “set-off’ against the $900,000 Beiersdoerfer was awarded as compensatory damages for his claims against the HRH corporations. We reverse and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

This is the fourth time this ease has been before this Court. See Beiersdoerfer v. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co., 953 So.2d 1196 (Ala.2006)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Styler v. Jean Bob Inc. (In Re Concept Clubs, Inc.)District Court, D. Utah · 1993
  3. Beiersdoerfer v. HILB, ROGAL AND HAMILTONSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. v. BeiersdoerferSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Little Narrows, LLC v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API