Legal Opinion

Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. v. Beiersdoerfer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 22, 2008No. 1060522PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilb, Rogal Hamilton Company ("HRH"), Hilb, Rogal Hamilton of Alabama, Inc. ("HRH Alabama"), and BDF-Meadows, Inc. ("BMI") (collectively referred to as "the HRH corporations"), appeal from the trial court's order denying their postjudgment motion in an action filed against them by Werner Beiersdoerfer. We reverse and remand.

I. Factual Background and Procedural History

This is the second time this case has been before this Court. In the previous appeal, we affirmed the judgment in part, reversed it in part, and remanded the cause for further proceedings. Beiersdoerfer v. Hilb, Rogal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Borders v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ruby Conway v. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Alfa Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. PaytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Beiersdoerfer v. HILB, ROGAL AND HAMILTONSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Safeway Ins. Co. of Alabama, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Ex Parte Indus. Dev. Bd. of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Ex Parte SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Harrison v. Alabama Forever Wild Land TrustSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Partridge, Smith, P.C. v. Loube Consulting International, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API