Rosenthal's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mb. Justice Dbbw :
The keystone of the opinion of the majority is found in the expression: “. . . the evidence clearly supports the findings made below to the effect . . . that the transaction was ‘unaffected by any taint of undue influence, imposition or deception’ and ‘was the free and intelligent act of [Mrs. Rosenthal] fully explained to [her] and done with a knowledge of its consequences.’ ” I cannot possibly subscribe to this conclusion.
I am convinced that a confidential relation existed in this case. The doctrine that the courts will regard a transaction between…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Leedom v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Ten Eyck v. . WhitbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- McCown v. FraserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- McConville v. InghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Nesbit v. . LockmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.