James v. United States Casualty Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Son. James Gibson, Judge. (1 ) Because the evidence conclusively shows, and the plaintiff admits that he was at no time “wholly disabled.” Assn. v. Millard, 43 111. App. 148; Saveland v. Casualty Co., 67 Wis. 174; Lyon v. Assn., 46 la. 631; Maccabees v. King, 79 111. App. 145; McKinley v. Ins. Co., 106 la. 81; Smith v. Lodge, 62 Kan. 75, 61 Pac. 416; Knapp v. Ins. Co., 53 Hun (N. Y.) 84; Rhodes v. Ins. Co., 5 Lans.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Son. James Gibson, Judge. (1 ) Because the evidence conclusively shows, and the plaintiff admits that he was at no time “wholly disabled.” Assn. v. Millard, 43 111. App. 148; Saveland v. Casualty Co., 67 Wis. 174; Lyon v. Assn., 46 la. 631; Maccabees v. King, 79 111. App. 145; McKinley v. Ins. Co., 106 la. 81; Smith v. Lodge, 62 Kan. 75, 61 Pac. 416; Knapp v. Ins. Co., 53 Hun (N. Y.) 84; Rhodes v. Ins. Co., 5 Lans. (N. Y.) 77; Bylow v. Ins. Co., 72 Yt. 325; Williams v. Assn., 91 Ga; 678; Merrill v. Ins. Co., 91 Wis. 329; Ford v. Assn., 148 Mass. 153;…
1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.
— The plaintiff, a wholesale and retail queensware merchant, fell from a street car and suffered injury. He had in force at the time with defendant company, what is known as an accident insurance policy wherein it was stipulated that if he was hurt in certain named ways, which caused certain described disabilities, he should receive indemnity at the rate of fifty dollars per week during the time he was disabled, not exceeding 104 weeks. He brought this action on the policy and prevailed in the trial court. The chief contention between the parties relates to the construction to be given, under…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dezell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Smith v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Hohn v. Inter-State Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Barth v. Kansas City Elevated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Stoner v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. TorranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.