Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Boardman Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 2011PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND OPINION IN SUPPORT OF REVERSAL

Justice SAYLOR.1

This civil litigation arises out of an accidental, in-transit deployment of a fire-engine hose, which caused the death of one child, severe injuries to another, and emotional distress on the part of family-member witnesses.

*927Appeal was allowed to consider: 1) whether this Court should adopt the product-line exception to the general rule of successor non-liability in strict products liability actions, and, if so, on what terms; and 2) whether, in strict liability proceedings, a plaintiff must prove a physical injury as a threshold to…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Lance v. WyethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Passarello v. GrumbineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Toney v. Chester County HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Doe v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API