Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Black

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 11, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDubord, J.

This case is before us upon exceptions of the defendants, Catherine Hughes Sexton and Patrick Sexton. There is nothing in the record to indicate the nature of the action except that in the motion for disqualification of the presiding justice, there is a brief statement to the effect that the litigation involves a bill for partition. The only other information we have is that contained on the cover of the record submitted, which indicates that this was a bill for partition brought by Clara M. Hughes, et al., against four defendants, two of whom are pressing exceptions in this court.

It appears…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bond v. BondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
  2. In re Allowance of Last Will of ReedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  3. Cunningham v. LongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926
  4. Sard v. SardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  5. Blaisdell v. Inhabitants of the Town of YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GagneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  2. Nelson v. FitzgeraldAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  3. City of Bangor v. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Council 74Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. MacCormick v. MacCormickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  5. Scott v. Central Maine Power Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API