Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Fitzgerald

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1965No. 544PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RABINO WITZ, Justice.

The principal issue to be resolved in this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in dismissing appellant’s causes of action. Appellant contends that since the trial judge had previously disqualified himself from hearing any matter in which John M. Savage, or his firm, was acting as attorney, the trial judge improperly dismissed appellant’s causes of action. 1 We agree with appellant’s contention and hold that under the unusual facts of this case the trial judge erred.

On January 15, 1964, appellant filed a three count complaint seeking to recover approximately $15,000.00…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Burton S. Knapp v. John P. KinseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  4. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. United States v. ValentiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gerety v. DemersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Channel Flying, Inc. v. BernhardtAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Amidon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Beckord v. District Court of the County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. In re G. K.Alaska Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API