Legal Opinion
Rodgers v. County of Yolo—Sheriff's Department
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 31, 1995No. Civ. S-92-1723 LKKPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, Chief Judge Emeritus.
Pending before the court is defendants’ motion for summary adjudication of plaintiffs’ fifth, sixth, and ninth causes of action. 1 After a hearing on March 13, 1995, the motion was taken under submission, and is disposed of herein.
I
THE COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs, Audrey Rodgers and Nellie Walters, were employed in the Animal Control Unit of the Yolo County Sheriff’s Department. They allege that they were sexually harassed by their supervisor, Raymond O’Neal, and plead claims for relief under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against both O’Neal and the County of Yolo.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burch v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Anthony v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1995
- Paiva v. City of RenoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1996
- Reitter v. City of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2000