Reitter v. City of Sacramento
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
KARLTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff sues her former employer, the City of Sacramento, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq., and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act, Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 12940, et seq., alleging a hostile work environment. 1 The matter is before me on the City’s motion for summary judgment. I decide the motion on the pleadings and papers filed herein and after oral argument.
I
THE FACTS 2
Plaintiff worked for the City in its Workers’ Compensation Department. Karen Long was plaintiffs supervisor. Toward the end of her tenure at the City,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bradley v. CAL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Smith v. County of HumboldtDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Ortiz v. Georgia PacificDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013