Legal Opinion

Armah v. Dowling

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 26, 2021No. 4:21-cv-00011Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA FRANCIS B. ARMAH, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 21-CV-0011-CVE-CDL ) JANET DOWLING, ) ) Respondent. ) OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is respondent Janet Dowling’s motion (Dkt. # 10) to dismiss the

28 U.S.C. § 2254

petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. # 1) filed by petitioner Francis Armah. Dowling urges the Court to dismiss the petition as barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)’s one-year statute of limitations. Having considered the petition, Dowling’s motion and brief in support (Dkt. # 11), and Armah’s response (Dkt. #…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API