Legal Opinion
People v. Cobb
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 13, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant contends, and the People correctly concede, that contrary to the determination of the County Court, his status as a reincarcerated parole violator did not render him ineligible to apply for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009, codified in CPL 440.46 (see People v Paulin, 17 NY3d 238, 241-242 [2011]; People v Vidal, 87 AD3d 1085 [2011]; People v Santiago, 87 AD3d 1077 [2011]; People v Howard, 85 AD3d 1202, 1202-1203 [2011]). Accordingly, the order appealed from must be reversed, and the matter remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. PaulinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. VidalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. IrvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. AshbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. AshtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- IRVIN, PLIEKOU, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. AshbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.