People v. Santiago
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant contends, and the People correctly concede, that contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court, his status as a reincarcerated parole violator did not render him ineligible to apply for resentencing pursuant to the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act, codified in CPL 440.46 (see People v Paulin, 17 NY3d 238 [2011]; People v Howard, 85 AD3d 1202, 1202-1203 [2011]). Accordingly, we reverse the order appealed from, and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new determination of the defendant’s motion. Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. PaulinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. CobbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. AshtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011