Legal Opinion

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 20, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant contends, and the People correctly concede, that contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court, his status as a reincarcerated parole violator did not render him ineligible to apply for resentencing pursuant to the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act, codified in CPL 440.46 (see People v Paulin, 17 NY3d 238 [2011]; People v Howard, 85 AD3d 1202, 1202-1203 [2011]). Accordingly, we reverse the order appealed from, and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new determination of the defendant’s motion. Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. PaulinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CobbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. AshtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011