Legal Opinion

People v. Vidal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 20, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1086The Supreme Court denied the defendant’s motion for resentencing solely upon the ground that his status as a reincarcerated parole violator made him ineligible for relief under the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act, which is codified by CPL 440.46. However, “prisoners who have been paroled, and then reincarcerated for violating their parole, are not for that reason barred from seeking relief under the statute” (People v Paulin, 17 NY3d 238, 242 [2011]; see People v Howard, 85 AD3d 1202 [2011]; People v Phillips, 82 AD3d 1011, 1012 [2011]).

Accordingly, the order appealed from must be reversed and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. PaulinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CobbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. AshtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API