Legal Opinion

Foshee v. Mims

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 28, 1966No. 5 Div. 808PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellees filed in this court prior to submission of this cause their motion to strike the transcript of record and to dismiss the appeal. The motion contains twenty-three grounds, which may be summarized: (1) That the transcript of the evidence taken ore tenus has not been lawfully transcribed and authenticated by the official court reporter of the trial court; (2) for that the ex-officio register of the trial court failed to certify that the transcript is complete as-provided in Title 7, § 767, Code 1940.

We think that all the grounds of the motion are without merit. It is to be noted that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Limbaugh v. ComerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Tanner v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Mobile School Comm'rs v. PutnamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1870
  5. Stokes v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Promenade Towers Mutual Housing Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Norton v. NortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Moody v. WakefieldCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. Norton v. NortonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API