Stokes v. Hart
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
LAWSON, Justice.
This is a boundary line dispute between appellees, as .complainants, and appellant, as respondent. There was a decree adopting the contention of complainants. Respondent has appealed.
Submission here was on appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal and on the merits.
Motion to Dismiss the Appeal
Appellees assert that the appeal should be dismissed in that the decree from which the appeal is sought to be taken is not a final decree.
There is no merit in this insistence. The decree fixes the boundary line between the lands of the complainants and the respondent as a certain section…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tanner v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kubiszyn v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Sylvest v. StowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Barnett v. MillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Cambron v. KirklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.