Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Hart

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 22, 1962No. 4 Div. 72PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

This is a boundary line dispute between appellees, as .complainants, and appellant, as respondent. There was a decree adopting the contention of complainants. Respondent has appealed.

Submission here was on appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal and on the merits.

Motion to Dismiss the Appeal

Appellees assert that the appeal should be dismissed in that the decree from which the appeal is sought to be taken is not a final decree.

There is no merit in this insistence. The decree fixes the boundary line between the lands of the complainants and the respondent as a certain section…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tanner v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kubiszyn v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Sylvest v. StowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  3. Barnett v. MillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. Cambron v. KirklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  5. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API