Legal Opinion

Atlantic Discount Corp. v. Young

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1944PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

Plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment of nonsuit entered below brings up the question of the sufficiency of the evidence offered to make out a case for the possession of a mortgaged motor truck as against a subsequent purchaser for value. The question debated in the briefs, whether the mortgage had been properly admitted to registry so as to ■constitute notice to a subsequent purchaser, we need not decide as we think the judgment below should be sustained on another ground.

It was made to appear that subsequent to the execution of the mort.gage on the motor truck described, to secure $850.00,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boice v. Finance & Guaranty Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. Whitehurst v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Whitehurst v. . GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Etheridge, Fulghum & Co. v. L. Hilliard & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. R. R. v. . SimpkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zendman v. Harry Winston, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Marsden v. Southern Flight Service, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1961
  3. General Credit, Inc. v. Winchester, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  4. Handley Motor Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Daas v. Contract Purchase Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API