Legal Opinion
Zendman v. Harry Winston, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 9, 1953PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.
On November 28, 1947, plaintiff Jane Zendman iQught a diamond ring for $12,500 at an auction held at the ;allery of Brand, Inc., on the Boardwalk in Atlantic City, New "ersey. Harry Winston, Inc., a diamond merchant located in lew York City, claims ownership of the ring.
Brand and Winston had done business together for years. It vas the custom of Harold Brand, the owner and proprietor of Brand, Inc., to visit Winston’s premises in New York several imes a month and select articles that were later sold at the 'allery in Atlantic City. In October of 1947, Brand chose the ing — later purchased by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Hutchison v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Saltus & Saltus v. EverettNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Root v. FrenchNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Mowrey v. WalshNew York Supreme Court · 1828
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Hall v. Bank of BlasdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. Stan Cross Buick, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. ElicofonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Suss v. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. HarterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.