Legal Opinion

Keokuk County v. H.B.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 28, 1999No. 97-726PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Justice.

This ease places a county and the state government at odds over the administrative and financial care of mentally disabled persons in Iowa. The county instituted an action in district court to resolve the controversy. We conclude the county failed to exhaust its administrative remedies and reverse the judgment entered by the district court.

H.B. is the mentally disabled individual at the center of the dispute. He is thirty-one years old and has received social security disability benefits based upon his mental disability since he was ten years old. H.B. resided in a variety of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. MandicinoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  2. Tigges v. City of AmessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Christie v. Rolscreen Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  4. Hornby v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  5. Bunger Ex Rel. Bunger v. Iowa High School Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rants v. VilsackSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Klouda v. Sixth Judicial District Department of Correctional ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. Simon Seeding & Sod, Inc. v. Dubuque Human Rights Commission and Jermaine StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. Alliant Energy-interstate Power And Light Company, Interstate Power And Light Company, Interstate Power And Light Company, F/k/a Ies Utilities, Inc., And/or Alliant Energy Corporation Vs. Bo Duckett, A/k/a Mary Duckett, F/k/a Mary E. JeambeySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  5. Ghost Player, L.L.C. and Ch Investors, L.L.C. v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API