Legal Opinion

State v. Mandicino

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 22, 1993No. 93-98PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

Defendant Rodney Mandicino complains of a self-inflicted wound. For reasons of his own he applied to have the period of his probation extended. The motion was granted, and Mandicino’s probation was revoked during the extended period. We granted discretionary review in order for him to challenge the revocation on the ground that the district court lacked jurisdiction to extend his probation. We affirm.

In February of 1991 Mandicino pled guilty to a charge of second offense operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Iowa Code § 321J.2 (1989). He was sentenced to 360 days of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christie v. Rolscreen Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  2. City of Des Moines v. Des Moines Police Bargaining Unit Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. Superior/Ideal v. OSKALOOSA BD. OF REV.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. State v. RyanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. McKim v. PettySupreme Court of Iowa · 1950

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Kevin Deshay AmbroseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. Van Sloun v. Agans Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. State v. OetkenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Larry D. Schaefer and Elaine M. Schaefer v. Dale L. Putnam, Putnam Law Office, and SMP, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  5. Klinge v. BentienSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API