Legal Opinion

Roundtree v. Kansas City Portland Cement Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court—Eon. Walter A. Powell, 'Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

Defendant operated an establishment for the manufacture of cement, and plaintiff was an employee, and while engaged therein his clothing was caught in cogwheels or gearing used in the operation of the machinery and he was injured. This- action is founded upon a petition in two counts: the first, at common law, was abandoned under- direction of the court. The second count was based on the following statute:

“Sec. 7828.—The belting, shafting, machines, machinery, gearing -and drums, in all manufacturing, mechanical and other establishments in this state, when so placed as to be dangerous to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barker v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  2. Laporte Carriage Co. v. SullenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Millsap v. BeggsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Case v. Cordell Zinc & Lead Mining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miniea v. St. Louis Cooperage Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Mabe Ex Rel. Mabe v. Gille Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Pavlo v. Forum Lunch Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API