Legal Opinion
William H. Van Vleck, Inc. v. Klein
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 1966PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurray T. Feiden, J.
This is an application for leave to -reargue the dismissal of a petition- brought pursuant to section 123 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law (49 Misc 2d 240). The application can be more accurately characterized as one for leave to renew.
*623At the outset it is necessary to dispose of the respondents’ objections that the application is not timely made because more than three months have elapsed since the order of the court was entered on its original decision and that the petitioner should pursue its appeal according to its notice of appeal served April 1, 1966. Generally speaking, reargument…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of Carroll v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Claim of Kopec v. Buffalo Brake Beam-Acme Steel & Malleable Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- In re the Arbitration between Friedman & FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- American Communications Association v. United States of America and Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Claim of Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re BeinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- State v. AllienSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Seidenberg v. McSorleys' Old Ale House, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Bermudez v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Merrill v. RalstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.