Legal Opinion
Claim of Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 3, 1954PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.
This is an unusual workmen’s compensation case, since here it is the permanently disabled workman who appeals from an order affirming an award to himself. Presumably, appellant, although he has actually received, from the carrier, payments of workmen’s compensation totaling $2,400 *48and has had his medical and hospital bills to the extent of $14,000 paid by the carrier pursuant to order of the compensation board, wishes the award set aside so that he may proceed with a pending third-party suit against his own employer (respondent Federal). The theory of that suit is, of course, that when…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- South Buffalo Railway Co. v. AhernSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Matter of Carroll v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Claim of Ahern v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Matter of Bollard v. EngelNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Werner v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Stine v. WeinerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- William H. Van Vleck, Inc. v. KleinNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Moakler v. BlancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Claim of Coe v. House Inside, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.