Legal Opinion
James Malcolm Tuggle, Jr. v. William Seabold, Warden, and David L. Armstrong, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 24, 1986No. 86-5172PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Chief Judge.
The district court granted a writ of habe-as corpus to the petitioner, Tuggle, and the respondents appeal. Accepting the report and recommendations of the magistrate, the district judge concluded that the proceedings under which Tuggle was convicted of knowingly receiving stolen property denied Tuggle his constitutional right to due process of law. The due process violation consisted of questioning Tuggle at trial about his postarrest silence. See Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).
I
Sometime during the night of January 1-2, 1982 Leonard Burke…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Anderson v. HarlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Steven v. Summers v. State of Utah Salt Lake Commissioners "John Does 1-5", and Salt Lake City Corporation Officer James E. FaraoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Earl Glen Hafley v. Dewey Sowders, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Thomas v. HalterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Ronald Fields v. Margaret Bagley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Johnnie F. Flournoy, Jr. v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt., Ralph Edward Dean v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt., Mark Dean Aldridge v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.