Legal Opinion

Ronald Fields v. Margaret Bagley, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 19, 2001No. 00-4032PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The district court granted petitioner-ap-pellee, Ronald Fields, a writ of habeas corpus because his due process rights and rights to counsel were violated due to his lawyer’s ineffective assistance. Fields’s lawyer neither notified Fields of a state-court appeal of his successful motion to suppress evidence nor represented Fields during that appeal. Margaret Bagley, the warden, appealed the district court’s grant of the writ of habeas corpus to this Court. Because the district court’s decision is well-reasoned and because Bagley did not raise issues beyond those considered by the…

3Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by43 opinions

  1. Leavitt v. AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Elem Ray Fulcher v. John Motley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. SteppCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Druery v. ThalerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  5. Bowling v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API