Bellocchio v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, Chief Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on seven motions to dismiss.2 Plaintiffs, Arthur and Carmelita Bellocchio, are proceeding pro se and bring this action against various federal, state, and local entities for damages arising primarily from noise and air pollution associated with the New Jersey Turnpike and the Philadelphia International Airport.
*370Because each defendant raises unique grounds for dismissal, the Court will address each separately. The Court is not unsympathetic to Plaintiffs’ complaints of noise and air pollution, nor does the Court…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gupta v. PerezDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- GAGE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- LIVINGSTONE v. HUGO BOSS STORE, ATLANTIC CITY, NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- TORRES v. MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021