Legal Opinion

Gupta v. Perez

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 27, 2015No. Case No. 14-4054 (FLW)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOLFSON, District Judge:

Pro se Plaintiff1 Arvind Gupta (“Plaintiff,” or “Gupta”) seeks judicial review of the February 27, 2014 Final Decision and Order issued by the Administrative Review Board (“ARB”) of the Department of Labor (“DOL”) regarding Plaintiffs DOL complaint filed against Defendant Wipro Limited (“Wipro”), and asserts associated other claims; Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by (1) Plaintiff; (2) Defendant Thomas Perez, Secretary of Labor (“the Government”); (3) and Wipro. Also before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arvind Gupta v. Wipro LtdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. Arvind Gupta v. Wipro LtdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  3. Jim Clemmens v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2025
  4. Liu v. DaytonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025
  5. PETERSON v. CITY OF JERSEY CITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API