Legal Opinion

Ricke v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1998No. C8-97-2071PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

On appeal from a summary judgment, an underinsured motorist (UIM) carrier argues that its insured was not entitled to settle her claims against all defendants and then claim UIM benefits based on a later stipulation to liability and damages because the settlement payment equaled her total damages. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Darla Ricke was a passenger in a motor vehicle owned and operated by Shane Lokken when the vehicle collided with a motor vehicle owned by John Olson and driven by Erie Olson. Ricke sued Lokken, John Olson, and two establishments that had served liquor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Rambaum v. SwisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Lessard v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Dairyland Insurance Co. v. StarkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Behr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API