Ricke v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
On appeal from a summary judgment, an underinsured motorist (UIM) carrier argues that its insured was not entitled to settle her claims against all defendants and then claim UIM benefits based on a later stipulation to liability and damages because the settlement payment equaled her total damages. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Darla Ricke was a passenger in a motor vehicle owned and operated by Shane Lokken when the vehicle collided with a motor vehicle owned by John Olson and driven by Erie Olson. Ricke sued Lokken, John Olson, and two establishments that had served liquor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Rambaum v. SwisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Lessard v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Dairyland Insurance Co. v. StarkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Behr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002