Armstrong v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ERWIN, Justice.
Appellant, Polee Armstrong, appeals from a conviction by jury verdict of manslaughter in connection with the death of his wife, Corrine Armstrong. The central issue at trial concerned the cause of her death. On appeal appellant complains of deficiency in proof on that issue, contends that the trial court erred in admitting photographs of the deceased, and alleges prejudice from certain comments made by the district attorney to the jury during closing argument and to the trial judge prior to sentencing.
*443SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE
We begin with appellant’s primary assertion…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Tad R. Knowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- People v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Hampton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. GarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HattonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Hensel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.