Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1972No. 1337PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERWIN, Justice.

Appellant, Polee Armstrong, appeals from a conviction by jury verdict of manslaughter in connection with the death of his wife, Corrine Armstrong. The central issue at trial concerned the cause of her death. On appeal appellant complains of deficiency in proof on that issue, contends that the trial court erred in admitting photographs of the deceased, and alleges prejudice from certain comments made by the district attorney to the jury during closing argument and to the trial judge prior to sentencing.

*443SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE

We begin with appellant’s primary assertion…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Tad R. Knowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  4. People v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hampton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. GarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. HattonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Hensel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API