Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Holzman

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 7, 2019No. Appeal No. 2018AP115Published

1Per curiam

¶1 This appeal involves three promissory estoppel claims made by Amy Holzman against the Estate of Phyllis G. Holzman. Amy challenges orders granting summary judgment to the Estate as to these claims. We reject Amy's arguments and affirm.

Background

¶2 Amy's mother, Phyllis, died on September 11, 2013. In February 2014, Amy filed claims against Phyllis's estate, indicating that the claims were based on "[p]romissory estoppel" for "student loans, legal expenses, house and living expenses in connection with claimant's legal education and career." The total amount claimed was $ 600,000. In…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lambrecht v. Estate of KaczmarczykWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Karnes v. Doctors HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Transportation Insurance Co. v. Hunzinger Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. U.S. Oil Co. v. Midwest Auto Care Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API