Legal Opinion

Munns v. Clinton

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 27, 2012No. 2:10-cv-00681-MCE-EFBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.

Presently before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed by Defendants Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton and Jennifer Foo (collectively “Defendants”) in their official capacities as Secretary of State of the United States and as an employee of the Office of the Secretary of State, respectively. Defendants already successfully moved to dismiss (hereafter “First Motions”) Plaintiffs’ original Complaint (“Original Complaint”), see Munns v. Clinton, 822 F.Supp.2d 1048 (E.D.Cal. 2011)…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API