Legal Opinion

Walker v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 19, 1981No. CR 81-73PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, by his attorney, has filed a motion for an extension of time for the filing of a brief. Appellant’s attorney is a non-resident who is not licensed to practice law in this State. A non-resident attorney will be permitted to appear in the Arkansas courts by comity and courtesy only upon satisfying the conditions set forth in Rule XIV, Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, Ark. Stat. Ann. Vol. 3A (Repl. 1979). One of the conditions is:

A non-resident lawyer will not be permitted to engage in any case in an Arkansas court unless he first signs a written statement, to be filed with…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Preston v. University of Arkansas for Medical SciencesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Willett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API