Legal Opinion

Walker v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 23, 1981No. CR 81-73PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

George C. Howard, of Chicago, Illinois, one of the appellant’s counsel, has filed a second motion to be relieved as counsel of record. That motion will not be considered unless and until Howard complies with Rule XIV, Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, Ark. Stat. Ann. Vol. 3A (Repl. 1979), pertaining to practice by comity. See Walker v. State, 274 Ark. 124, 622 S.W. 2d 193 (1981). A formal statement will have to be filed with the clerk of this court, not merely an expression of willingness as indicated in this second motion.

Furthermore, counsel must be prepared to show this court that no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Willett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API