Fitz Henry v. Munter
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal front a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Snell, J., entered June 3, 1903, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff after a trial before the court without a jury, dismissing intervenor’s complaint interposed as a creditor to secure a distribution of the proceeds of a sale of merchandise in bulk.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
The facts found by the court are substantially as follows: That prior to the 20th day of January, 1903, defendant Sarah Hirschfield was conducting in the city of Tacoma a drygoods and notion store, in the ordinary course of trade, and had been so conducting the same for some time prior thereto; that, in accordance with a certain notice which was inserted in the Tacoma Daily Hews, she commenced selling her goods at auction on the 20th day of January, through plaintiff William Fitz Henry, as her auctioneer, and continued said auction sale until the 23d day of January, 1903, at which time Mr.…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Jaques & Tinsley Co. v. Carstarphen Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Kohn v. FishbachWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Fecheimer-Keifer Co. v. BurtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Friedman v. BrannerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.