Legal Opinion

Clophus v. General Motors Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1989No. B14-87-1025-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEARS, Justice.

This is an appeal of a take nothing jury verdict in a products liability case. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

Murphy Clophus and his wife sued General Motors (GM) for injuries he received when a bus manufactured by GM fell on him, cutting off the oxygen supply to his optic nerve and resulting in blindness. Clo-phus, who was a Metro1 mechanic at the time of the accident, alleged (1) that the RTS 11-01 bus was defectively designed, and, especially in regard to its six inch ground clearance, was unreasonably dangerous as designed, and (2) that GM had misrepresented…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Herbert v. HerbertTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Cropper v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. AndradeTexas Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re E.I. Dupont De Nemours and CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. Charity Cravens, Wyatt Craig Cravens Sr., and Kathy Cravens v. Alisam Enterprises LLC, Alisam Holdings LLC, and Grover Lee Burnham Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2021
  3. Deann Marlett v. Donald Moyer, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2021
  4. in Re James Thibodeaux, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API