Legal Opinion

Wood v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1990No. 57260PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his personal injury action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.

The evidence most favorable to the lower court’s decision is as follows. At the time of the injury, defendant-respondent Procter & Gamble operated a plant in St. Louis City where it manufactured soap and other household products. Respondent maintained silos at this plant to store materials necessary for its manufacturing. In 1987, moisture entered silo 710, which contained a dry chemical in powdered form, causing a three foot thick layer of the chemical to cake onto the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Madden v. C & K Barbecue Carryout, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. McGuire v. Tenneco, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. Green v. Crunden Martin Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Miller v. Municipal Theatre Ass'n of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. National Indemnity Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Waterwiese v. KBA Construction Managers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Schneider v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Taylor v. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Wilson v. Unistrut Service Co. of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Gemini Capital Group, LLC v. TrippMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API