Legal Opinion

United States v. Gears

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided October 26, 1993No. S92-732MPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MILLER, District Judge.

On September 23, following hearing, the court denied cross-motions for summary judgment, finding varying inferences permissible from largely undisputed facts. See Glass v. Dachel, 2 F.3d 733, 740 (7th Cir.1993). The parties agreed to submit the case for decision on the summary judgment record, with supplemental briefing. This memorandum is intended to satisfy the court’s obligations under Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a). The case involves the government’s claim for reimbursement of education expenses against a former United States Naval Academy midshipman. For…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Gilligan v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Albert JACKSON, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. William R. Glass v. Alfred H. Dachel and County of ChippewaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Favreau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Neutze v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Favreau v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  4. United States v. ChrzanowskiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  5. Favreau, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API