Daugherty v. Wiles
Texas Commission of Appeals
Error to Court of Civil Appeals, Fourth Supreme Judicial District. Consolidated actions by J. H. Wiles against L. H. Bradford and another and against B. M. Daugherty and another, respectively. Judgment for plaintiff was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (156 S. W. 10S9), and defendants Daugherty and an- other bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtStrong, J.
The plaintiff, Wiles, instituted two suits, one being against L. H. Bradford and Patrick Henry on two notes payable to Wiles, aggregating the sum of $1,275, and the other being against plaintiffs in error, Daugherty and Hancock, on two notes executed by them, payable to L. H. Bradford and Patrick Henry, and being otherwise conditioned as the notes involved in the other suit, it being alleged by Wiles that they were delivered to him by Bradford and Henry as collateral to secure the payment of their notes. The suits were consolidated.
Bradford and Henry answered by general demurrer and general…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bradstreet Co. v. GillTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Western Assurance Co. of Toronto, Canada v. KemendoTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- City of San Antonio v. PizziniTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Elder, Dempster & Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
3Cited by34 opinions
- Thraves v. HooserTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Reed v. HesterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Cherokee Water Co. v. ForderhauseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Norris Bros., Inc. v. MattinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.