City of San Antonio v. Pizzini
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County. The city obtained writ of error on the affirmance, on its appeal, of a judgment obtained against it by Pizzini, with judgment over against it by its codefendants Hildebrand & Hamilton.
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.
This case is like that of the City of San Antonio v. Smith and Hildebrand & Hamilton, recently decided by this court, except that in the present case the judgment of the District Court in favor of defendant in error Pizzini, as well as that in favor of defendants Hildebrand & Hamilton, against the city, was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals, and the city assigns error upon both parts of the judgment of affirmance.
We are of opinion that the assignments of error by which the city seeks to reverse the judgment in favor of Pizzini were correctly decided by the…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Reed v. HesterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Daugherty v. WilesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Merchants' & Manufacturers' Lloyd's Ins. Exch. v. Southern Trading Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Shawnee Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson RowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. PigottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.