Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Lutz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
It is contended by plaintiff that the court erred in not instructing the jury in accordance with the provisions of sec. 1636 — 49, Stats. 1921, the material part of which is as follows:
“At the intersection of any street or crossroad, and where, for any cause, the view in the direction in which the vehicle is proceeding, shall be obstructed, the speed shall be reduced to such a rate as will tend to avoid danger of accident.”
*64The jury were instructed generally as to the law of the road and that the law provided that
“No person shall operate or drive any automobile . . . recklessly or at a rate of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Linden v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by9 opinions
- Osborne v. CharbneauWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Siegl v. WatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Burns v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
- Laflamme v. LewisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- Musante v. GuerriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.