Legal Opinion
Washington v. Maricopa County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 14, 1945No. 11087PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
Appellants are holders of highway improvement bonds issued by Maricopa County, Ariz., in the years 1919 and 1921. Incorporated in the bonds are specific due dates. Some of the bonds have matured, others have not. On demand of Maricopa County the Loan Commissioners of the state instituted proceedings to refund the unretired portions of the two issues on the view that the bonds were legally subject to call and refunding whenever such operation is to the profit of the state.1. Appellants sued in the district court asking that it be adjudged that the right to call the bonds…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Stewart v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Tidal Oil Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Anthony v. County of JasperSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Northern Bank of Toledo v. Porter Township TrusteesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doyle v. Huntress, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Bradbury v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Clifton v. DecillisArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Kimberly R. Pratt v. State of Maine, and Margaret B. Brown, State of Maine Probation and Parole OfficerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Standard Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.