Doyle v. Huntress, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
The issue presented in this interlocutory appeal is whether the 1988 codification of the maritime safety laws in Title 46 creates a cause of action for lay share fishermen under the “highest rate of wages” provision of 46 U.S.C. § 11107, and the liability provisions of 46 U.S.C. § 10601. We hold that it does.
I
This appeal arises out of a compensation dispute between plaintiffs-appellees, Timothy Doyle, Greg Hagaman, Brian Lague, Anthony W. Richards, and Eric Edwards (“the fishermen”), former deckhands on the fishing vessels the PERSISTENCE and RELENTLESS, and the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dodd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Francisco Sanchez v. Esso Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Siaca v. DCC Operating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Ruiz-Rosa v. Rivera-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Block Island Fishing, Inc. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Lyman v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.